Damam is also the goal of John Cage's 4'33": the creation of a ritual silence in the concert hall, bounded in space and time, as a sort of lens or camera obscura for perceiving the music of the ongoing world.
If LLM-based AGI can only learn from what is said, will it ever approach the understanding of what could/should not be said, or is that understanding not part of AGI?
Many of your sources are inaccurate in this post. For example, not only does the root שתק not appear in the source you mentioned - it doesn't even appear in the Torah at all. Was ChatGPT used here?
This is fascinating as usual. But unless I am mistaken, this statement is incorrect:
"This same verb appears when God commands, "Be still (דֹּמּוּ) and know that I am God" (Psalm 46:10) and when Job’s friends “sat with him on the ground seven days and seven nights, and no one spoke a word” (Job 2:13, using יִדֹּם)."
The verse from Psalms (46:11 not 46:10) uses the verb הרפו not דמו. And the verse from Job says ואין דבר אליו, not ידם.
Damam is also the goal of John Cage's 4'33": the creation of a ritual silence in the concert hall, bounded in space and time, as a sort of lens or camera obscura for perceiving the music of the ongoing world.
If LLM-based AGI can only learn from what is said, will it ever approach the understanding of what could/should not be said, or is that understanding not part of AGI?
Many of your sources are inaccurate in this post. For example, not only does the root שתק not appear in the source you mentioned - it doesn't even appear in the Torah at all. Was ChatGPT used here?
This is fascinating as usual. But unless I am mistaken, this statement is incorrect:
"This same verb appears when God commands, "Be still (דֹּמּוּ) and know that I am God" (Psalm 46:10) and when Job’s friends “sat with him on the ground seven days and seven nights, and no one spoke a word” (Job 2:13, using יִדֹּם)."
The verse from Psalms (46:11 not 46:10) uses the verb הרפו not דמו. And the verse from Job says ואין דבר אליו, not ידם.